|
| |||
|
Avaliação (na língua de ensino) | Grading and Assessment (in language of instruction) | |||
|
[Re The work to be developed along the sessions is divided in theoretical and contextual presentations followed by a joint debate based on the scheduled readings. Each student will make a communication on a topic/ work of the programme. He/she will chair a debate on a concept/ theoretical point to draw out the students’ critical and argumentative abilities. He/she will write a review about an item of the recommended bibliography, and a final essay on a theme of his/her choice (previously approved by the seminar’s Supervisor) within the seminar’s scope and research goals. The students are invited to participate in initiatives (communications in conferences; round tables) fostered by Research Centres within the seminar’s field of studies. Assessment: essay (8.000 to 10.000 words): 36%; oral presentation: 24%; review: 18%; chairing a theoretical debate: 12%; assiduity: 10%. ferir os elementos de avaliação e o peso relativo de cada um na classificação final] | |||
|
Bibliografia (selection) | Readings (selection) | |||
|
Ackroyd, P. London the Biography. Vintage, 2000. Baccolini, R., & T. Moylan, eds. Dark horizons: Science fiction and the dystopian imagination. Routledge, 2003. Claeys,G. & L. T. Sargent The Utopia Reader. N. Y. U. P. 2017. Gordin, M., H.Tilley et al., eds. Utopia/Dystopia: Conditions of Historical Possibility. Princeton U. P., 2010. Lefebvre, H. The Urban Revolution. U. Minnesota P., 2003. Martinotti, G. The new social morphology of cities. MOST. D.P.S.-16. http://www.unesco.org/most/martinot.htm. Miles, M. Art, Space and the city: Public art and urban futures. Routledge, 2000. Miles, M.et al. The City Cultures Reader. Routledge, 2000.
|