Sumários
The data of philosophical arguments
16 Fevereiro 2024, 09:30 • Delia Belleri
Weinberg, Jonathan M. ; Nichols, Shaun & Stich, Stephen (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29 (1-2):429-460.
Epistemic Romanticism
Intuition-Driven Romanticism
The Normativity Problem
Cultural variations: Nisbett and Haidt
Hypothesis 1: Epistemic intuitions vary from culture to culture.
Hypothesis 2: Epistemic intuitions vary from one socioeconomic group to another.
Comparing Ws, EAs, and SCs
TruetempCases
Gettier Cases
Comparing different SES
Doubts on Intuition-Driven Romanticism
Objections and replies
The data of philosophical arguments
9 Fevereiro 2024, 09:30 • Delia Belleri
Gettier cases and the use of intuitions
Close reading of:
Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121–123.
Goldman, A. I. (1967). A causal theory of knowing. Journal of Philosophy, 64(12), 357–372.
The data of philosophical arguments
6 Fevereiro 2024, 09:30 • Delia Belleri
Analysis in analytic philosophy
- Analysis as decomposition
- Analysis as paraphrase
- Analysis as elucidation
- Analysis as construction (explication)
The Paradox of Analysis
- Informativeness and synonymity are mutually exclusive
- Decomposition-and paraphrase conceptions are affected by the paradox
Philosophy and the sciences
2 Fevereiro 2024, 09:30 • Delia Belleri
Sellars: the manifest image vs. the scientific image
Reading and in-class discussion of the text: Sellars, W. 1991. ‘Philosophy and the scientific image of man’, Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero: Ridgeview.
Philosophy and the sciences
30 Janeiro 2024, 09:30 • Delia Belleri
Philosophy and the sciences
The sciences progress, philosophy does not progress
Examples and counterexamples
Naturalism
Hard and soft naturalism
Ontological vs. Methodological naturalism
Wittgenstein rejects methodological naturalism
Sellars: the manifest vs. the scientific image
Parallel, irreducible descriptions: they have toco-exist
Philosophy as ‘humanistic’
Inquiry from first vs. third person perspectives